Posted 12 January 2018 - 10:38 PM
Posted 13 January 2018 - 12:45 AM
My essay on EAKs etc should cover everything you need to know: http://black.net.nz/avedis/NAK.html
Not all the EAK hi hats have the K on the undersides of the hats. Some do. Some don't. But the lathing style will tell you if they qualify as EAKs or the later IAKs (or something else). There are also differences in hammering style, but lathing is often easier to spot. I've also got data on expected prices, but that isn't published yet. Let me know if you want to know something about prices.
Posted 13 January 2018 - 08:14 AM
Posted 13 January 2018 - 11:49 AM
Posted 13 January 2018 - 02:03 PM
You see both types....with the K on the underside and some without. I can't say for sure but I believe the K underneath was short lived on the hats ...
I haven't got any evidence one way or another linking presence/absence of a K underneath to year of manufacture. Since 13" hats came out in 1984 and 14" and 15" hats came out in 1982, I'm watching for 13" hats to see whether any have the K underneath. That's the only testable hypothesis I've been able to come up with. But even then we probably won't get a clear answer because ink can be cleaned off at any point.
Perhaps somebody realized that putting branding ink underneath hats is pretty much a waste of ink since you don't see it when the hats are in use? Rides and crashes, yes. Hats? Not really worth the extra inking step in terms of visibility.
Nice looking EAK hats, Salem. The real deal.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users