Senor Pepe, would you like to give this man a kiss? Oh, siiiiii, si, si.There are flames on my car. Their are flames on my car!
I think Bond is the perfect foil for the notion of "(a role that) can't ever be played by anyone else.Don't mean to start a Bond war, but...as much as I like Sean Connery... Bond is Moore. (Or Dalton - I thought they should cast him in that role when he was still Remington Steele. But I've actually never seen him as Bond.) Connery was too old for Bond - especially in the later ones.
My word, you're so sensitive.So...yea...anyone can be “replaced”...in an absolute sense. So we just move a few words around and we get this:
In your opinion, name movie roles you think were played the best they could ever be played by the person who played them...in YOUR opinion...
(Notice the double use of “opinion”, which in the interwebs means NO ONE can overrulle you or question your response, thereby ruining the point and purpose of an otherwise fun and harmless thread).
With that ‘crapola’ out of the way....I don’t think these were mentioned...
Paul Newman and George Kennedy in “Cool Hand Luke”.
Burl Ives as “Big Daddy” in “Cat on a Hot Tin Roof”.
Sensitive! Moi?My word, you're so sensitive.
No one's been over-ruled - and the only reason why one (or more - I wasn't the only one to post about Bond) person's opinion could "ruin" a thread is by folks being so thin skinned they can't begin to handle their "fun and harmless" thread be anything other than what They specifically think it should be.
That's said (meaning I can post what I want, just like you can Mongrel, right???) - did anyone else read that there was an early-on serious consideration to make The Matrix as a vehicle for Sandra Bullock in the role of Neo???
Anyway... back to listing any performance we've ever liked in a movie....
I just don't see why there was the need to do a bust at all.maybe I should have filled thepost with unicorns and smileys?
Really?I just don't see why there was the need to do a bust at all.
If don't like the direction I take in a thread - then address the topic or ignore it.
But to just outright dismiss it as "crappola"? What is that about? Thus again... sheesh.
Sorry if I misconstrued your confession - but with your previous attack that was supposedly sarcasm. Followed by your rambling confession - not an apology - as you made it clear with "I DID neglect to add any clarifying indications of sarcasm.... And you are right to call me out on It." that nothing approaching an apology was coming.Really?
I confess my sins...give you the “win”....
and you come back with THIS?
Take care man....and again “all the best”.