Pearl showing non-pipe tom holders?!

fusseltier

Very well Known Member
Platinum Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
531
Reaction score
305
Location
Earth
Circle will never be more sturdy then square. They were also the first I saw that really allowed for the stealth type look where they could go low. Have seen plenty powder coated black to blend into the stage more.

I also don't understand a rack for 3 cymbals, but that's a different discussion altogether.

B27UHqzIcAEV6r7

Looks like you need a separate person to hit some of those cymbals
 

fusseltier

Very well Known Member
Platinum Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2018
Messages
531
Reaction score
305
Location
Earth
Circle will never be more sturdy then square. They were also the first I saw that really allowed for the stealth type look where they could go low. Have seen plenty powder coated black to blend into the stage more.

I also don't understand a rack for 3 cymbals, but that's a different discussion altogether.

B27UHqzIcAEV6r7


images
Looks like you need a separate person to hit some of those cymbals
 

Quai34

Very well Known Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
988
Well, I know almost nothing about Pearl Drums besides the fact that some of my drummer friends have them, with the tube that I don,t like at all but now, the Air system and the L mount seems to be awesome!! As "Mapex always" has shown us some beautiful finishes in blue colours and mine set is blue as well, it could be some temptation for me compared to a Tama Star High end kit.
 

Quai34

Very well Known Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
988
Circle will never be more sturdy then square. They were also the first I saw that really allowed for the stealth type look where they could go low. Have seen plenty powder coated black to blend into the stage more.

I also don't understand a rack for 3 cymbals, but that's a different discussion altogether.

B27UHqzIcAEV6r7


images
Well, my rack might be Gibraltar, an old one that came with my kit, I prefer it as it was smaller footprint than normal stands and I was able to put 8 cymbals on it, only on the front part, plus 4 small extra on extension on 4 cymbals...So, not bad. So, I agree, if just few cymbals, use stands, more, use a rack and there are not ugly, well, I don,t think so, mice leaves the cymbals to shine more, I have less poles and tubes and all things than with stands.
 

karlcrafton

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2011
Messages
265
Reaction score
272
Location
Detroit, MI
"Something many said we would NEVER, EVER do".....

Great move IMO.

I always liked Pearl gear but hated the huge tubes.

The huge tubes (all the companies went to) were what made RIMS needed in the first place.
Then, with the RIMS, we couldn't just put a new head and tune up with the drum on the mount and get as much resonance as we wanted in the first place.
Take the drum off, tune it up, put it on the mount, re-tune because it's different....
Thanks giant tubes....

I'm just happy there are other mounting options these days.
 

chakosticks

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2020
Messages
89
Reaction score
127
And kill resale value on non-Pearl kits
Slingerland butchered their kits with similar mounts towards the end of the Niles era, probably what killed them off! (not that set-o-matic mounts were any good, in fact they were horrible in terms of durability)
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
4,145
Reaction score
4,162
Location
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
I was a District Sales Manager for Pearl from 1996 to 2007.
At every sales meeting -- roughly twice a year -- the entire sales force begged the Japanese Bigwigs to change that tom-arm.
No go. Say what you like, but it is efficient and cheap to produce (especially the earlier geared ones). It is also rock-solid, though there are inherent adjust-ability problems.
NO GO! Our Japanese overlords refused to change. They jumped through ridiculous hoops to make the old design palatable to drummers (Gyro-lock, etc). They were too tied up in the brand identification of the clunky 7/8" arm. Never mind the market demands (as reflected by the sales team).
The same thing happened with low-end maple shells, and the Afro Percussion name (remember that?).

Keeping the Afro Percussion name could be a legal binding agreement with its founder John Vermeulen (a Dutchy)
 

frankmott

Humble (drum) shop-keeper
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
3,467
Reaction score
2,434
Location
N.E. Ohio
Keeping the Afro Percussion name could be a legal binding agreement with its founder John Vermeulen (a Dutchy)
Yes, I remember John. He was at all the US trade shows when Pearl first bought his company. Pearl may have been legally obligated to keep the Afro name, but they never offered that as a reason. Their excuse always struck me as the "sunk-cost fallacy." For better or worse, the name just wasn't flying in the US market. At first "Pearl" wasn't on any of the product or advertisements, then it appeared, but very small. Over the years it grew, and finally they dumped the Afro name altogether -- something the sales-team was advocating for all along.
 
Top