I just read this - Ringo was quite busy drumming on the rest of the Beatles material after Revolver...That fact of the matter is there is no video evidence of Ringo playing 95% of the post Revolver material.
This is also where we see the drumming become far more sophisticated and experimental. Diverging in style from the Rockabilly style that put Starkey on the map.
I am curious if there is another drummer out there that has reached the acclaim of Starkey that no one has seen replicate his most iconic parts.
There are multiple videos from the Abbey Road, Let It be sessions, not least of which is the rooftop concert (1969) where anyone can see Ringo is playing great and in the exact same style as every previous Beatles record. His playing on the rooftop is entirely consistent with his experimental playing on previous albums. Get Back for instance and The Two Of Us.That fact of the matter is there is no video evidence of Ringo playing 95% of the post Revolver material.
And there's no video evidence of Charlie Watts recording Let It Bleed, Sticky Fingers or Exile on Main Street. Or video of John Bonham recording any LZ records (that I'm aware of). Do we think someone else played on those records? Hmmm... it's got me thinking...That fact of the matter is there is no video evidence of Ringo playing 95% of the post Revolver material.
Ringo's playing evolved, as did his sound and his set up. But it still, and always, sounds like Ringo. Why is that hard to understand or accept?This is also where we see the drumming become far more sophisticated and experimental. Diverging in style from the Rockabilly style that put Starkey on the map.
These men all toured these recordings, people have watched them replicate the songs live and on video recordings of the event.And there's no video evidence of Charlie Watts recording Let It Bleed, Sticky Fingers or Exile on Main Street. Or video of John Bonham recording any LZ records (that I'm aware of). Do we think someone else played on those records? Hmmm... it's got me thinking...
Ringo's playing evolved, as did his sound and his set up. But it still, and always, sounds like Ringo. Why is that hard to understand or accept?
And Ringo played a bunch of songs on the rooftop at Saville Row 1969.These men all toured these recordings, people have watched them replicate the songs live and on video recordings of the event.
If Charlie Watts went on tour with The Rolling Stones and brought Jim Keltner with him to do the majority of the drumming that would be more congruous.
Paul was on Howard Stern before Christmas and I recall him mentioning that they had a rule that if it was your song you directed everyone how it needed to be played. Once they got famous it got harder and harder for everyone to get motivated to get into the studio and Paul essentially became the defacto leader to kick everyone in the ass to get something done. Along with that came the resentment that started building up over time.That was great. I’d never seen it.
I’ve never thought it unusual that John and Paul suggested parts for Ringo to play. They were the song writers and had a vision of how they wanted the song to sound. They might have suggested ideas or parts, but Ringo made all those songs his own.
And the notion that Paul was anywhere nearly as proficient as Ringo is just plain silly.
You talk such nonsense so authoritatively.Ringo played on the Beatles albums. Period. Andy White played on a single (and b-side), and Paul played on 4 songs on the White Album (Martha My Dear, Dear Prudence, Back in the USSR, and Ballad of John and Yoko). Ringo was everything else, and anyone who states something different hasn't done critical listening on the Beatles. There's TONS of video footage of Ringo in the studio -- and there's an entire new documentary coming out just from previously unreleased footage. This theory, like most conspiracy theories, doesn't hold the slightest bit of water.
You know, Nacci... I could be wrong, but I'm beginning to think you're not a Ringo fan...You talk such nonsense so authoritatively.
The only thing more tiresome than a person who thinks everything is a conspiracy is one who promotes the idea that none exist.
Speaking of which, what conspiratorial idea, specifically, do you accuse me of?
That there is scant video evidence of Starkey replicating the majority of his parts post Revolver?
If you have evidence to the contrary; post it.
That is not true John.You know, Nacci... I could be wrong, but I'm beginning to think you're not a Ringo fan...![]()