Tommy D
DFO Veteran
The glorification of it by a huge amount of artists that took over almost an entire decade, yes.dale w miller said:Good thing that's a thing of the past now that THAT genre has run its course.The drugs & alcohol, Sexism & strippers, over-the-top playing & look, were not something I could relate to
Too easy.Monty said:Nickelback.I don't think any band that reaches that kind of popularity would be considered "terrible".
This did not help.Nacci said:No doubt?! How did Nickleback get a bad rap to begin with? They certainly weren't as bad as the Beatles.^^^ While I'm not a fan, the people that have bought their over 50 million records would disagree with you. ^^^
While formulaic in nature, what you are hearing is Nickleback's "sound" moreso than a rip off of one of their other songs. AC/DC has a very distinct sound which verges on ripping themselves off album after album, but nobody hates AC/DC for this. If people enjoy a band's sound, why should they change it? Why not keep hitting home runs record after record?
Some bands try to create a new sound for a new place that they are in and get ostracized by the fans because of it. Metallica's "Black Album" to this day still gets thrown under the bus by "purists" as being a sell out album. So its damned if you do and damned if you dont I guess.
Last edited by a moderator: