1961 article that mentions K. Zildjian stamps!

  • Thread starter toddlittle827
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

toddlittle827

Very well Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2016
Messages
618
Reaction score
1,080
Location
United States
This is an interesting bit from a Dec. 1961 article on cymbals (The School Musician) written by Morris "Arnie" Lang of the New York Philharmonic Orchestra

I don't think it's anything groundbreaking - says K. Constantinople stamped cymbals are pre WWII and K. Istanbul stamps are post WWII but very, very cool to see someone writing about the actual details of the metal stamps.

A couple things to consider on that point 1) the article comes 16 years after the end of the war - would take it with a grain of salt as far as drawing a line like that goes 2) My understanding is Turkey was neutral during the war so the stamps could've possibly changed to Istanbul between 1942 and 1946 before Gretsch started back to normal business post-war and no one in the USA noticed until ~ 1947. Or they could've changed a bit earlier than that, right before American got into it and Gretsch went to wartime footing and Mr. Lang missed the switch. (one thing that I'll point out here is that based on some of the research I've done, is that once the USA joined the war, Gretsch was essentially not in the drum business until it ended while some of the other companies seemed to still be continuing operations on a smaller scale.)

That said, a major change like this could've happened at this (~1947) point when Gretsch and K. Zildjian resumed their partnership and importation began again. Makes sense on some level. I would also say the same regarding the switch from the Type 0 to the Type I stamp. Possibly something that happened after WWI when Ks started to be seen in the US again in 1919. Or perhaps even a couple of years later when Ludwig & Ludwig became the US exclusive distributor in 1921.

That said, as mainly a Paiste guy, maybe there are more definitive sources for dating the various changes to the K. stamps that I'm unaware of.
 

Attachments

  • 1961 What Kind of cymbals A.JPG
    1961 What Kind of cymbals A.JPG
    66.9 KB · Views: 49
  • 1961 What kind of cymbals B.JPG
    1961 What kind of cymbals B.JPG
    24 KB · Views: 51
Last edited:
Arnie wasn't actually incorrect in his statement, but he may have been misquoted or spoke in broader sense. My understanding has been that the stamp changed after WWI, not WWII. The Republic of Turkey was established in 1923 and the city of Constantinople was renamed Istanbul in 1930. Or maybe I am wrong?
 
no, the city on the K stamp definitely didn't change to Istanbul after WWI ended in 1918. The cymbals may not have even had Constantinople on them at that point. No one knows for sure when that (Constantinople) was added. Sometime between 1907 and 1921 imho.

The Gretsch US trademark for Ks in 1928 says Constantinople and I think it's pretty much accepted by those that know a lot more about this than I do that "Constantinople" remained on the cymbals until at least somewhere around 1940 despite the name change to Istanbul happening in 1930. Lang's take would push that back a bit to perhaps as late as somewhere around 1947 when the two companies resumed their relationship after WWII. If you read the article blurb closely you'll see that he refers to the "Turkish Crescent" on the Constantinople cymbals. that didn't happen until the Type 3 Constantinople logo which is thought to be post-1930. Ks from right after WWI did not have the Turkish Crescent on them nor does the 1928 Gretsch trademark which contains a large portion of the logo from that time period.

Highly unfortunate is that Gretsch didn't update it's catalogs and promotional materials to incorporate Istanbul until sometime between 1959 to 1961, but Istanbul had already been on the cymbals for some time by that point. By using an inaccurate graphic design of the logo on its materials for so many years, Gretsch threw a monkey wrench into the dating process for those of us trying to suss this out today.
 
Last edited:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
What I find most interesting in the article is his quality assessment of Avedis vs old Ks, and between older and newer old Ks. He's basically saying that the older Ks were more consistently good than the newer ones. Since the article is from 1961, he seems to be comparing what we call old stamps versus intermediate stamps.
 
What I find most interesting in the article is his quality assessment of Avedis vs old Ks, and between older and newer old Ks. He's basically saying that the older Ks were more consistently good than the newer ones. Since the article is from 1961, he seems to be comparing what we call old stamps versus intermediate stamps.

interesting read - Lang, an early cymbalholic
 
Back
Top