need help identifying china 13 1/4" ? Cymbal

  • Thread starter BillySlingerland
  • Start date
  • This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.

BillySlingerland

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2023
Messages
81
Reaction score
33
Location
Warwick, Rhode Island
Hey Guys and Gals Got this 14" China Cymbal in a buy of various 60's drums/cymbals and just need one
of you cymbal experts to help me identify it..My take on it is it's an early Zildjian factory second but it
has no Zildjian Stamp on it just stamped "S". Second to last pic is before cleaning (I know it's not popular to clean vintage cymbals lol)
Can any of you more Cymbal Knowledgeable dudes/dudettes help me out? Thanks, Billy
 

Attachments

  • china 2.JPG
    china 2.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 39
  • china4.JPG
    china4.JPG
    26.8 KB · Views: 34
  • china6.JPG
    china6.JPG
    45.4 KB · Views: 36
The "S" stamp would indicate a second, or one deemed to be not up to full Zildjian standards. It's still a Zildjian A.
Looks to be from the 60's to 80's based on lathing. The bell is awfully large imo.....possibly 5" or large....too big for a 14" that normally has a 4" bell.
Any chance this shows signs of being cut down? The edge looks a bit rough or serrated in the photo.
 
Hi Thanks, yes it's possible it was cut down some of the edges look a bit wonky.
I read somewhere that Zildjian gave the S designation for asthetic imperfections but not quality of sound..much
like Gibson Guitars did with their second stamp on les pauls etc...
Thanks for your input.

Billy
 
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links like Ebay, Amazon, and others.
That looks like a regular cymbal which has been inverted, as well as being cut down. It is not a China, nor Swish, nor Pang. Tama CW is right about the size of the bell. I've got a 14" Hi Hat which is cut down from an 18". The bell has the same proportions as yours seems to. Zildjian uses a Medium Cup on 18" and larger cymbals. During the likely years for your cymbal 17" and smaller cymbals had the Small Cup. So yours would have been 18" or more before cutting down.

Given it has been inverted and cut down I don't like your chances of popping it back into normal shape. You don't have leverage with the rest of the cymbal missing.

I'd love to know where you read that Zildjian used the S designation "for asthetic imperfections but not quality of sound". I am still collating information on when the S designation was used to update my older work. We know it started early (by the 1940s) and continued for a few decades.


I'll come back with images of inversion and my Medium Cup cut down to 14" Hat when I get a chance.
 
Last edited:
Here is an inverted cymbal. 16" Small Stamp. Looks like yours but with the Small Cup. Claimed it was a China. Not a China. ;-)

16-nvrt-side.jpg


16-nvrt-bot.jpg


Common cup sizes


zildjian-bells.png
 
My 14" Large Stamp (LS1 aka block stamp) showing the relatively large size of bell (which is a Medium Cup).

HB-14.jpg


Paired with a normal 14" hat with Small Cup you can see the difference clearly enough.

HB-vs-SS-14-bells.jpg


The 14" cut down hat nested into another Large Stamp 18" shows how the bow curvature matches perfectly. I also tried it nested in a 19", 20" and 22" to see that it didn't nest as perfectly.

HB-in-LS-18.jpg


Given that yours is not just cut down but also inverted, I don't believe it would ever do as a Hi Hat, but it might make an interesting effects cymbal. But I can't know for sure as I haven't had hands on an inverted cut down cymbal. :dontknow:
 
Just to tidy off the story about "S" or second cymbals:


Screen Shot 2024-01-19 at 1.59.38 PM.png


We have examples of "S" stamped cymbals going back to the 1940s as I showed on my site. Perhaps those who wrote "the sixties" in the FAQ weren't around in the 60s, and are like so many who think that the 60s is "really old" and put everything into that category. The latest example I have looks 70s enough to me. 20" and 2406g and looks like

20-2406-top.jpg


20-2406-stamp.jpg


20-2406-bot.jpg


So the evidence for the end of the "S" period is consistent with the Zildjian FAQ. However, not all seconds have an "S" which complicates matters. I haven't had time to go thought all my thousands of records and images to tidy up all the cymbals which we are sure are A Zildjian but lack either an "S" or an ordinary trademark stamp. Then there are the cymbals produced for certain dealers which have other things pressed in...like ZILWAVE for Frank Wolf.

12-335-345-stamp2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top